Practical one that it designates the arrival definitively of squares Christmas is the assembly of the celebrity and adored Christmas tree. This is a scene that, for the smashing majority of the families, if uncurls in an environment of full tranquilidade, being irrelevant any types of external quarrels to the mere act to celebrate the Christmas. However, a controversy that if repeats year year after and that it involves some organisms of the scientific community, as well as some associations of carcter exists not-governmental: the debate around the ambient impact that the Christmas tree involves. In cerne of the quarrel it is already the old question to decide that sort of pine of Christmas, if artificial or if natural, is the solution most ecological. It has some years behind, the lesson that if taught in the schools was clear and direct: the artificial option is most sustainable.
The arguments that presented in them, by the way, were fully convincing. To know more about this subject visit Gordon Allport. The risk of desflorestao caused for a massivo cut of trees it justified the artificial option fully. However, passing of the time brought new ideas and realities, and currently the use of the artificial pine already is not so consensual. However, having in consideration that most of us since was always taught to opt to the artificial one, it will be interesting to observe what it will have moved however. The main problem of the false pines is in the fact of its production to be made to the policloroeteno base, a substance derived from fsseis fuels not passvel of reclagem. In according to place, it stops beyond already the cited composition, has several other pollutants freed during the production of these trees that are cancergenas, being one strong public threat to the health.
It is the case of the 1,2-dicloroetano and the dioxinas. It also has other composites that are applied to become the plastic most malleable and that they cause some problems to the level of the devices reproductive and renal. But although this terrifying scene, many also insist that the culture massivo of natural trees has equally dangerous consequncias for the health and environment. The erosion of green spaces is not only a risk more than known, as well as the constant pesticide use and used chemical seasonings in the commercial culture of pines, what it puts all at risk a public water net. Thus being, it has that to conclude: which is then the best solution for the problem? Of all the involved problems, of the natural trees seem to be most easy to skirt. By the way, already exists makes who it: to practise a biological agriculture (not-pollutant) in the culture of the pines and to vender them with the roots! In time to abate or to order to abate a tree, if you to buy with the enclosed root and to preserve it, most of the problem could be decided. When making it (and articulating with more ecological methods of agriculture), he will be helping to have a more ecological Christmas, skirting the counterparts and betting in the benefits. If he has not limited to be seated waiting for the Christmas presents: it offers to you yourselves a gift to the planet, contribundo for a better world.